anarchy or illiteracy?
After some time I sign here again to speak of a cause, which the majority have probably already here. can
".. A bet made in all women's teams, this may, however, only once on the same weekend place (Friday to Sunday): To the following paragraphs (cited excerpts from the BFV Youth Rules § 27 (7)) turns the whole thing. " actually a passage to zero but can really zero room for interpretation, since it is formulated clearly. The head of the passport department of the BFV response surprised when I asked him about our case, because the matter so clearly regulated. My official opinion as coach of the women can Schwandorfer
read here, my unofficial I am going to reveal, not so nachtreten because I want to, but because it is just simply unfair, and also on the injury not just irresponsible. This is not only the work of an entire season, which eat their players have not made at Indoor Championships, put at risk, but the health of amateurs handled almost reckless with appetizers.
But I repeat again a little further out to new readers is not necessary to read into this matter. On Friday the first of May we had in the Cup semi-final of the TV Nabburg a guest. The B-junior older vintage Nancy Mayd gave off a very strong game and scored a goal and was involved in another. The game ended 3-0 for us. On Sunday, 3 May, we met again on the TV Nabburg. I sat Nancy Mayd an account quoted above does not rule. Nabburg however, was a B-for the second time a junior this weekend. The game ended 0-1. If one reading is powerful, this case is actually a clear matter. Use of a legitimate non-playing player usually means an x \u200b\u200b:0-rating.
That this is not necessarily to be the case, we have not experienced the last few days. First, it said in the guestbook Nabburger that one official said, according to this rule is quite can be interpreted differently.
read here (post 2143) . Well one thinks anything of it at first, because the sports court will know what it decides. Then I got a call from said official shortened with the content (free formulated, so as not to admit the perfectly ridiculous price):
"Think about just the consequences if you paid ad." Even now for me was still clear that the sports court can never decide that it turns against us, and finally we had abided by the rules and the opponent is obviously not. I learned better than in Wednesday night after our precious box game the sports court judgments looked up and found that there is a new setting, because the Nabburger is guilty because of the misinformation of the functionary no culpable offense. But that was then, unfortunately, not all. A day later, I shared the game leader with namely, that the date for our replay on Tuesday 19th May is set at 19 clock.
Now begins the whole, losing his funny character because it is really only a hobby or leisure so, what we are doing there. We have in fact following schedule thus:
- 13th May catch-up game at FC Edelsfeld
- May 17 game against SpVgg Ramspau
- 19th May catch-up game against TV Nabburg
- 21. May cup final against 1.FC finishing 23rd
- May point game at the TV Barbing
ie 4 games in seven days, which itself should not be in the professional sector. Apart from the fact that this schedule in the professional standing players, which in our case, in part, have been young, time is hardly feasible, the question arises whether it is also the risk of injury or vertetbar. A renowned physician whose skills recently by the world football body FIFA was honored with the title ceremony, answered this question clearly NO. Certainly the interest of a director a round robin game to finish on time course, but should therefore put the health of amateur female athletes at risk? know my answer to this question you safe. So I'll try
everything to prevent the discharge of this game on Tuesday. And it would be contrary to expectations, but come this far, I and my players will come up to us what media attention to draw attention to this injustice. Should also seriously injured one of my players in these games, I will point out that if a causal relationship with the burden, even a civil action is possible. Who cares about the player when they do their job because of an injury caused by loses a factor? No one.
with best regards
Roland
